Energy data & analytics

Turn fragmented evidence into a usable decision.

Hands-on modeling and engineering context for energy economics, dependable capacity, asset performance, and procurement risk.

01 / Analytical discipline

From raw inputs to a defensible recommendation.

A model is useful when its inputs, limitations, and decision consequences are clear.

01

Data that can be traced

Multi-source processing, SQL, data-quality checks, and reproducible pipelines establish a consistent baseline before modeling begins.

Source register · Units and time alignment · Exceptions
02

Models that expose the tradeoffs

Forecasting, regression, optimization, Monte Carlo, and scenario analysis are selected to fit the question and the quality of the evidence.

NPV / IRR / TCO · Sensitivities · Downside cases
03

Results that can be challenged

Explicit assumptions, out-of-sample testing where applicable, version control, and documented exceptions help reviewers understand the limits of a result.

Validation record · Review trail · Decision conditions

02 / Applied workstreams

Start with the decision you need to make.

Explore four connected areas of analysis. The methods and outputs are tailored to each assignment, rather than presented as fixed software products.

The decision / 01

What changes the investment case?

Compare solar, storage, and supply structures against the same load, tariff, cost, and delivery assumptions.

01 / Evidence in
  • Load profiles & tariffs
  • PPA / merchant revenue
  • CapEx / OpEx & timing
02 / Analytical lensScenario & sensitivity analysisPython · Excel · NPV / IRR
03 / Decision out
  • Comparable cost and return cases
  • Downside exposure and key sensitivities
  • Assumptions behind the recommendation

Engagement scope and outputs are tailored to the available evidence.

Explore economic advisory

03 / Applied AI · Prototype

Trace the finding.
Keep the judgment.

At HelioVector, Ray designed a procurement-risk AI prototype that combines source-cited LLM extraction with deterministic Python checks. It checks for missing requirements, units and ranges, warranty exclusions, and schedule dependencies.

Its role is to surface reviewable exceptions. Engineering and commercial decisions remain with the human reviewers.

View the experience behind this work
PROTOTYPE · HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED
8risk categories
50+encoded checkpoints
  1. 01
    Extract with citations

    Connect a finding to the underlying source.

  2. 02
    Check deterministic rules

    Flag gaps, units, ranges, and dependencies.

  3. 03
    Route the exception

    Keep human review in the decision path.

Development prototype. Findings require human review before use.

Start with the decision

Have a model to build, a scenario to test, or a decision to clarify?

01 / Your asset02 / Your decision03 / Your timeline

Discuss a decision study, an analytical workstream, or owner-side advisory. A useful starting point is the asset, the decision, and the date it needs to be made.

ray@heliovector.ai New Jersey / New York · Working across North America